Which of the following is NOT considered puffing?

Puffing refers to statements that are subjective opinions or exaggerated claims made in the course of real estate marketing and sales. These types of claims typically do not possess legal consequences because they are generally recognized as opinions rather than fact.

In the context of the provided options, the statement about having a buyer ready, willing, and able to purchase a property when there is no such buyer is not just puffing; it's a misrepresentation and potentially fraudulent. This statement implies a specific factual situation that is not true, which can mislead a seller and create liability for the agent.

On the other hand, the statements that describe the house having the best view in the city, that the brokerage uses the latest technology, and that the property appears to meet the buyer's needs are all subjective claims or personal opinions. These kinds of statements are generally viewed as puffing, as they express enthusiasm or personal satisfaction regarding the property or services without asserting a measurable reality.

Thus, the first option represents a factual misrepresentation rather than puffing, making it the correct choice for the question asking for what is NOT considered puffing.