Which situation would NOT be a violation of fair housing law?

The situation which involves denying a mortgage loan to a Hispanic mother with poor credit is more nuanced. While refusal based on race is clearly a violation of fair housing laws, the determination of loan eligibility based on credit history is generally permissible. Lenders are legally obligated to assess potential borrowers based on their creditworthiness, which includes examining credit scores, income, and other financial factors.

If the denial of the mortgage is solely based on the individual’s poor credit history, and not influenced by their race or ethnicity, then it does not constitute a violation of fair housing laws. However, it’s essential for lenders to apply these criteria consistently across all applicants to ensure compliance with the Equal Credit Opportunity Act, which prohibits discrimination based on race, color, religion, gender, or national origin among other characteristics.

In contrast, the other situations mentioned (lowering appraisal value due to proximity to a mosque, refusing to rent to a blind person, and showing houses only in high-income neighborhoods) involve discriminatory practices based on protected characteristics, such as religion, disability, and socioeconomic status, respectively.